Does the porn industry always have to show the mainstream world how to cater to consumers?
According to an article in last week’s Wall Street Journal, the music industry is finally starting to ally with peer-to-peer (P2P) sites. The rapper Jay-Z, “at the request of Coca-Cola Co., agreed to allow distribution of [an 8-minute concert clip] on P2P sites, using technology usually used to thwart music pirates.”
The article continues,
"now there’s a growing recognition among some record executives and performers that the people who are downloading illegally are frequently huge music fans and that marketing to them may be more desirable in the long run than suing or otherwise harassing them."
No shit.
As I reported earlier this year, the porn industry started taking rapid measures years ago to respond to online piracy in a relatively fluid way, turning piracy around to work to the industry’s advantage.
As the president of Playboy.com Randy Nicolau remarked in 2004, P2P networks provide “direct marketing at its finest.” Playboy started giving pictures away to other sites that in turn directed visitors back to Playboy.com. In order to reinforce this pattern, Playboy has started paying Webmasters $25 for every subscription they funnel to Playboy.com; as support, Playboy offers tools to help make the free Web sites more effective.
Ever since the advent of P2P networks, the media, musicians, the music industry, and the business world have decried the end of entertainment as we know it. With the only means of making money for studios/artists effectively undermined, there could be no other future for entertainment than anarchy and ruin.
Obviously, that didn’t happen. Porn provides the proverbial canary in the coal mine proof that P2P doesn’t have to destroy an industry—it does, however, require vast change.
In a statement nearly parallel to Nicolau's, Jay Z's attorney Michael Guido explains the revelation:
"The concept here is making the P2P network work for us. While P2P users are stealing the intellectual property, they are also the active music audience, and this technology allows us to market back to them."
Perhaps the porn industry is more evolved in its response because it was hit early with the issue of piracy via P2P networks. But based on the industry’s history of leading the pack in terms of technology (wit VHS tapes, the Internet, Web cams, cell phone cameras, etc), I would attribute the porn industry’s adept response to market changes to an innate flexibility built into the industry that mainstream industries seem to lack. Any theories as to why this is?


