Many of you may have read Dan Savage's take on Joan Sewell's book I'd Rather Eat Chocolate, which extolls the pleasure of accepting with women's "naturally" lower libidos. Savage argued (mostly in jest) that now that it's understood women won't ever want to have sex with their partners, straight men everywhere are off the hook for doing the dishes:
Back when women with low libidos were regarded as abnormal—way back at the beginning of the month—it was fashionable to blame the man in a woman's life for her lack of desire. For years, whenever I printed a letter from a guy who wasn't getting any, or wasn't getting much, mail would pour in from women insisting that he had to be doing something wrong.
I called them the "if only" letters: If only she didn't have to do all the housework, she would want to have sex. If only he would talk with her about her day, she would want to have sex. If only she weren't so exhausted from taking care of the kids, she would want to have sex. If only he didn't ask for sex, she would want to have sex. Well now, thanks to Sewell, straight guys everywhere know that it doesn't matter how much housework you do, or how sincerely interested you are in her day, or how much of the child care you take on: She still won't want to fuck you. So leave the dishes in the sink, grab a beer, and go play a video game, guys. Your "if only" nightmares are over.
A different and more serious angle in this whole debate is a piece Susie Bright wrote last year about men with low libidos--Men Who Love Burgers: But Aren't So Sure About Sex:
When feminists and sex researchers started talking about women's sexuality in the 1960s, it became clear that one reason women didn't feel connected to their sexual self interest was because so many of them had never had sexual satisfaction to begin with. Finally, many liberated women spoke up, admitting that they'd never had an orgasm, and didn't know where to begin.
Sex is the one area men are supposed to excel in, by default. Their penis is so obviously "there"; their masturbation practice practically demands itself. They get an added helping of testosterone, and the same amount of encouragement to be virile that girls get to be virgins.
So when we see men today, non-plussed with sexual companionship, is it because they too, are losing their orgasmic pleasure, or because they lack desire altogether?
I don't really know what to make of it. Perhaps people have artifically high expectations about sexual desire in relationships. Maybe girls and boys need to learn to play nicer. Maybe technology enables us to have enough emotionally and sexually satisfying experiences without the involvement of "real" people? Or maybe we're all taking too much Prozac...


Recent Comments